![]() ![]() Synthetic / bio-fabricated horn could give credence to the notion that rhino horn has medicinal value, which is not supported by sound science.More than 90% of “rhino horns” in circulation are fake (mostly carved from buffalo horn or wood), but poaching rates continue to rise annually.There is no evidence that selling synthetic / bio-fabricated horn would reduce the demand for rhino horn or dispel the myths around rhino horn and could indeed lead to more poaching because it increases demand for “the real thing”.Having considered the available media coverage, SRI and IRF concluded that they were “opposed to the development, marketing and sale of synthetic rhino horn” for the following reasons: Will rhino poaching stop with the sale of synthetic / bio-fabricated rhino horn?.What is the impact on the synthetic / bio-fabricated horn business if trade in real rhino horn is legalised?.Will any proceeds from these synthetic / bio-fabricated rhino horns go towards rhino conservation?.How will synthetic / bio-fabricated horn be distinguished from real rhino horn?.How will synthetic / bio-fabricated rhino horn be priced?.Will people want to buy synthetic / bio-fabricated rhino horn?.How will this synthetic / bio-fabricated rhino horn be marketed and to whom?.How close will this synthetic / bio-fabricated rhino horn be to the real thing?.How are these companies proposing to manufacture synthetic / bio-fabricated horn?.In response to numerous media releases about the intent of several companies – Rhinoceros Horn LLC, Pembient and Stop Poaching Through Synthetic Rhino Horn – proposing to manufacture and sell synthetic / bio-fabricated rhino horn, in June 2015 SRI and IRF published a joint statement on their respective websites, which outlined the issues and claims:ĭrawing on interviews and articles published online, the statement asked a series of questions and expanded upon them: Save the Rhino International / International Rhino Foundation position Opposition to plans to produce synthetic / bio-fabricated rhino horn Those people or organizations working on demand-reduction and behaviour-change strategies in rhino horn consumer countries, who may be concerned that allowing trade in synthetic / bio-fabricated horn maintains and develops a consumer base that wishes to progress to real horn.Those people or organizations in favour of a legal international trade in rhino horn, who may be concerned about synthetic / bio-fabricated horn undercutting their potential marker. ![]() Law enforcement officials in rhino Range States, and rhino horn transit and consumer countries, who would be required to distinguish between illegal real rhino horn and potentially legal synthetic / bio-fabricated horn. ![]() The Nagoya Protocol has been adopted by 71 Parties (75 Ratifications ) (92 Signatures ) ![]() All international governments that must implement the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization (ABS) to the Convention on Biological Diversity, which provides a transparent legal framework for the effective implementation of one of the three objectives of the CBD: the fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising out of the utilization of genetic resources.The proposed development of synthetic / bio-fabricated rhino horn should concern a wide range of stakeholders: elephant ivory, lion bones or pangolin scales. Over the past two years or so, Save the Rhino International (SRI) and the International Rhino Foundation (IRF) have been monitoring the progress of four US-based companies that have announced their intentions – with varying degrees of success – to produce synthetic or bio-fabricated rhino horn, and occasionally also other products including e.g. Joint Statement by the International Rhino Foundation and Save the Rhino International. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |